![]() As always, the user who does not pay money will be at a clear disadvantage compared to the one who does pay, adding to the fun of the game. The downside of Battle Nations is that it offers the NanoPods in exchange for real money and these can be used to acquire buildings and more powerful units or accelerate construction. Battle Nations is a freemium turn-based strategy multiplayer video game originally developed and published by Z2Live. You have to be clever at this point and divide the work among all the soldiers that are posted. If it is the only unit left standing, we will lose many turns and it is more than likely that we will also lose the battle. Some units offer a specific number of shots and if we exceed it, it will take quite a few rounds to replenish. When the battle begins, each player has a turn to roll and try to deal as much damage as possible. We choose the units that we want them to fight, we place them in the spaces that we think are most appropriate and the opposite does the same with its own. It must be emphasized that battles take place in turns. There is also the possibility of fighting with other people online to get battle points that will give us access to prizes that are impossible to get otherwise. Our mission is to eliminate them using all available army units at that time. Since Battle Nations is a battle game, from time to time we will receive visits from invaders and animals. There is a very large variety of buildings with different utilities that, in addition, can be improved to be more efficient.Īs always, available resources will put us on the brakes more than we would like, making progress somewhat desperate at times when we already have a fairly high level. Our territory will have to be built up to get a population and for it to get resources or pay taxes. Once we are at work, we will see that Battle Nations is an outright strategy game. This part is a bit heavy but luckily, can be skipped by pressing the forward button in the lower right corner. Combining the strategy genre and multiplayer mode, this title manages to hook the user from the first second.Īfter creating our player profile, Battle Nations will put us in a situation with various animations and conversations between the characters that will teach us all the ins and outs of the game. Battle Nations is one of the most popular games on the App Store.
0 Comments
![]() The bass versions were adapted straight from JMI’s guitar pickups (which were based on Strat pickups) with four larger magnet poles. ![]() The Symphonic Bass kept its early V1 pickups until 1964/’65 a year earlier, the Phantom had been given improved V2 pickups with individual string magnets. Independent fine tuning bridge, units are built into the tailpiece unit. Full contoured body, slender reinforced adjustable neck. ![]() Its smooth styling makes this 6nstrument attractive and elegant. ![]() The 1963/’64 Vox catalog described the Symphonic as “An electric bass in the modern style. Controls were two Volume knobs and a master Tone, like the Jazz. In the mid ’60s (when basses were expected to be thumpier), this could be perceived as an advantage. This gives the bass an arguably greater range of sound than the Jazz Bass, with its second pickup by the bridge. The most-original piece of design is the two pickups – one middle position, the second near the fretboard. The Symphonic has features from both the Precision Bass and Jazz Bass. distributor, JMI had plenty of opportunity to study them in detail even the distinctive Phantom and Teardrop models had a structural design and hardware plainly derived from Leo’s ideas. Like the Soundcaster guitar, this curiously warped copy had an “almost but not quite” appearance, with subtle deviations from the Precision’s lines. The Symphonic Bass first appeared in England in late ’62 (shortly after the Phantom IV) as JMI/Vox’s second “professional” four-string with a (very) Fender-like body and 34″ scale. name – the Symphonic Bass – and even Fender dealers had to squint at the illustration to see the instrument wasn’t one of theirs. In that catalog, it was called the Stingray Bass earlier literature used its original U.K. There’s little further evidence of how this progressed, but for the next few years it didn’t keep Thomas from enjoying a windfall with Vox, though it did remove one instrument from the U.S. With CBS’ corporate money flowing, Don Randall announced, “No longer will Fender try to stop imitators by amicable negotiations.” “So can you.”įender could ignore this when JMI distribution was confined to the U.K., but not after SoCal-based Thomas Organ began aggressively promoting Vox in the U.S. “The top Beat Groups have made a lot of money with Vox,” Thomas crassly announced to potential dealers. The same issue (a NAMM convention special) partly illustrated why in a bound-in Thomas Organ ad/catalog trumpeting Vox as “The Million Dollar Sound – the sound of money.” Besides Beatles-endorsed amps, Vox guitars were heavily featured, many looking like Bizarro World Fenders. A report in the June ’65 Musical Merchandise Review included the headline “Fender Files Infringement Suits” and detailed action in a federal district court with the defendant listed as the Thomas Organ Company, which for a year had been U.S. Rick Huxley of the Dave Clark 5 with a ’64 Symphonic. One time it did happen was triggered by the Vox Symphonic Bass. Despite the way collectors and dealers freely apply the term “lawsuit guitars,” documented examples are few. ![]() Some organizations including Human Rights Watch have fabricated reports on Xinjiang, but their sources are just a small group of extremely anti-China overseas Uyghurs. Third, the false claim of human rights violations in Xinjiang. In November 2020, former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo even removed the ETIM from the US list of foreign terrorist organizations. Nothing has been said about relevant groups' close ties with Al-Qaeda and their violent and terrorit rhetoric. Second, the illusion that the ETIM is for peace. This is often done by instigating certain groups to carry out separatist activities to make the public believe people in Xinjiang all want an independent state. Here are what they seek to achieve:įirst, a false impression that Muslims in Xinjiang support "independence". Under this strategy, the United States, Britain and their allies, latching on to the Cold War mentality, have directed their intelligence establishments and anti-China scholars to mobilize Uyghur diaspora groups in spinning out misinformation about the so-called severe oppression of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang,which was spread by mainstream Western media in a coordinated manner. ◆The CIA suggested in 2003 that should the US find itself in a crisis or confrontation with China in the future, the option of using the "Uyghur card" as a means of exerting pressure should not be taken off the table. Between 19, the Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) frequently plotted and carried out terrorist attacks, which claimed more than 1,000 civilian lives. ![]() Some violent terrorist organizations overtly clamored for targeting and attacking Chinese nationals. Terrorists entered Xinjiang from the battlefields in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria. The above-mentioned factors have caused the rapid spread of radical ideas in Xinjiang. Since 2004, the National Endowment for Democracy has funneled US$8.76 million to Uyghur diaspora groups campaigning against China's policies in Xinjiang. Over the years, there emerged a number of anti-China institutions and extremist groups seeking a state of "East Turkistan" or "independence" of Xinjiang, including the World Uyghur Congress and the East Turkistan Government-in-Exile. US and British intelligence agencies supported Pan-Turkism in order to weaken Russia and China and serve their agenda of maintaining a unipolar world. The neoconservative forces in the US pivoted from the Soviet Union to containing China's influence in Central Asia. ![]() ◆Right after the Cold War ended, the United States and Britain started to use Xinjiang as a leverage to contain China, by supporting separatist and terrorist forces. Together with Saudi Arabia and Britain, the United States provided funding, equipment and training for Muslim guerrillas fighting against the Soviet Union. The United States then launched Operation Cyclone, which lasted from 1979 to 1989 and cost up to US$630 million each year. Zbigniew Brzezinski, the National Security Adviser to President Carter, argued that the United States must prevent the realization of "the age-long dream of Moscow to have direct access to the Indian Ocean". ◆During the Cold War, British scholar Bernard Lewis concocted the theory of "arc of crisis" aiming to fracture countries from the Middle East to India based on ethnic lines to divide the Soviet Union. As early as in the last century, the United States and other Western countries started to support separatist and terrorist activities in Xinjiang out of geopolitical purposes in order to destabilize China and contain its development. Let us get to the bottom of what's going on and reveal the ins and outs of the lies about Xinjiang. The recent reports by independent US news website and Australian publication Australian Alert Service, and a series of press conferences held by the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region have revealed the truth about the fraudulent Xinjiang-related "databases" and the so-called "witness testimonies" and, with abundant facts and figures, exposed the real mastermind behind them. Truth shall not be tainted, the world should not be deceived and narrative about Xinjiang mustn't be distorted. In recent years, manipulated and encouraged by the anti-China forces in the United States, some truth-bending "academic institutions", rumor-mongering "experts and scholars" and "amateur actors" with no moral scruples have created a chain of lies to defame Xinjiang and mislead international public discourse, often through dirty funding, fact-twisting stories and massive smear campaigns. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |